Implementation of fixed point of minimally invasive surgical robot: a survey

Lianjie GUO; Hu SHI; Xuesong MEI

doi:10.51393/j.jamst.2020003

Volume 1 Issue 1

Jan. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology > 2021 > 1(1): 2020003

Lianjie GUO, Hu SHI, Xuesong MEI. Implementation of fixed point of minimally invasive surgical robot: a survey[J]. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology , 2021, 1(1): 2020003. doi: 10.51393/j.jamst.2020003

Citation:

Lianjie GUO, Hu SHI, Xuesong MEI. Implementation of fixed point of minimally invasive surgical robot: a survey[J]. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology , 2021, 1(1): 2020003. doi: 10.51393/j.jamst.2020003

Citation:

PDF( 11978 KB)

Implementation of fixed point of minimally invasive surgical robot: a survey

doi: 10.51393/j.jamst.2020003

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710100, China

Publish Date: 2021-01-11

Abstract

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery(MIS)has the advantages of less trauma and quick recovery, so it is favored by patients. However, there are more requirements for surgeons' skill and experience in MIS. Combining robot-assisted tech-nology with MIS can improve the quality of surgery and shorten the learning time for surgeons. Besides, with the help of robot-assisted technology, remote surgery can be achieved. Because of small incisions in MIS, the manipu-lator must pass through a fixed point during movement, which is the key point to develop the MIS robot and an obvious feature of the MIS robots. The ways whose classification is made into mechanisms with redundant degrees of freedom (DOF) and constrained by mechanisms to meet the requirement are summarized, and the principles, advantages, and drawbacks of each method are analyzed in this article. Based on summarizing the research results and analyzing the key technologies, the insight into future work is proposed.
- Robot,
- Minimally invasive surgery,
- Remote center of motion,
- Degrees of freedom,
- Remote surgery

FullText(HTML)

References(34)

References

[1]	. Tan K, Shi H, Wang Y, et al. Design and kinematics analysis of parallel robotic arm for urological surgery. 2019 International Conference on Mechatronics, Robotics and Systems Engineering (MoRSE). 2019.p.253-258.
[2]	. Murthy RA, Clarke NS, Kernstine KH. Minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy:a review. Inno-vations:Technology and Techniques in Cardiotho-racic and Vascular Surgery 2018; 13(6):391-403.
[3]	. Shi H, Li JJ, Guo LJ, et al. Control performance evaluation of serial urology manipulator by virtual prototyping.Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engi-neering 2020; (in press).
[4]	. Locke RCO, Patel RV. Optimal remote cen-ter-of-motion location for robotics-assisted minimal-ly-invasive surgery. IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation. 2007.p.1900-1905.
[5]	. Mayer H, Nagy I, Knoll A, et al. The Endo[PA]R system for minimally invasive robotic surgery. Pro-ceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Confer-ence on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2004.p. 3637-3642.
[6]	. Hagn U, Nickl M, Stephan J, et al. The DLR MIRO:a versatile lightweight robot for surgical applications. Industrial Robot 2008; 35:324-336.
[7]	. Hagn U, Konietschke R, Tobergte A, et al. DLR MiroSurge:a versatile system for research in endo-scopic telesurgery. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology & Surgery 2010; 5(2):183-193.
[8]	. Allett SG, Rossitto C, Cianci S, et al. The Sen-hance^TM surgical robotic system ("Senhance") for total hysterectomy in obese patients:a pilot study. Journal of Robotic Surgery 2017; 12:229-234.
[9]	. Marescaux J, Rubino F. The ZEUS robotic system:experimental and clinical applications. Surgical Clin-ics of North America 2003; 83(6):1305-1315.
[10]	.Wang YF, Uecker DR. A new framework for vi-sion-enabled and robotically assisted minimally inva-sive surgery. Computerized Medical Imaging & Graphics 1998; 22(6):429-437.
[11]	. Kraft BM, Jager C, Kraft K, et al. The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery:increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient? Surgical En-doscopy & Other Interventional Techniques 2004; 18(8):1216-1223.
[12]	. Marescaux J, Rubino F. The ZEUS robotic system:experimental and clinical applications. Surgical Clin-ics of North America 2003; 83(6):1305-1315.
[13]	. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al. Transat-lantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001; 168(2):873-874.
[14]	. Ghodoussi M. Robotic surgery-the transatlantic case. IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation. 2002.p. 1882-1888.
[15]	. Wang W, Li J, Wang S, et al. System design and animal experiment study of a novel minimally inva-sive surgical robot. Int J Med Robot 2016; 12(1):73-84.
[16]	. Kuo CH, Dai JS, Dasgupta P. Kinematic design considerations for minimally invasive surgical robots:an overview. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 2012; 8(2):127-145.
[17]	. Aksungur S, Aydin M, Yakut O. Real-time PID control of a novel RCM mechanism designed and manufactured for use in laparoscopic surgery. Indus-trial Robot 2019; 47(2):153-166.
[18]	. Hata N. Needle insertion manipulator for CT and MR-guided stereotactic neurosurgery. Interventional Mr Techniques and Clinical Experience 1998; 5(2):814-821.
[19]	. Berkelman P, Ma J. A compact modular teleoper-ated robotic system for laparoscopic surgery. The International Journal of Robotics Research 2009; 28(9):1198-1215.
[20]	. Lum MJH, Rosen J, Sinanan MN, et al. Optimi-zation of a spherical mechanism for a minimally in-vasive surgical robot:theoretical and experimental approaches. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engi-neering 2006; 53(7):1440-1445.
[21]	. Lum MJH, Friedman DCW, Sankaranarayanan G, et al. The RAVEN:design and validation of a tele-surgery system. The International Journal of Robot-ics Research 2009; 28(9):1183-1197.
[22]	. Hannaford B, Rosen J, Friedman DW, et al. Ra-ven-II:an open platform for surgical robotics re-search. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineer-ing 2013; 60(4):954-959.
[23]	. Dehghani M, Moghadam MM, Pourya T. Analysis, optimization and prototyping of a parallel RCM mechanism of a surgical robot for craniotomy surgery. Industrial Robot 2017; 45(1):78-88.
[24]	. Ballantyne GH, Moll F. The Da Vinci telerobotic surgical system:the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surgical Clinics of North Amer-ica 2003; 83(6):1293-1304.
[25]	. Raheem AA, Troya IS, Kim DK, et al. Robot-assisted fallopian tube transection and anastomosis using the new REVO-I robotic surgical system:feasibility in a chronic porcine model. BJU Interna-tional 2016; 118(4):604-609.
[26]	. Lim JH, Lee WJ, Park DW, et al. Robotic chole-cystectomy using Revo-i Model MSR-5000, the newly developed Korean robotic surgical system:a preclinical study. Surgical Endoscopy 2017; 31:3391-3397.
[27]	. Kim DK, Park DW, Rha KH. Robot-assisted par-tial nephrectomy with the REVO-I robot platform in porcine models. European Urology 2016; 69(3):541-542.
[28]	. Taylor RH, Funda J, Eldridge B, et al. A telerobotic assistant for laparoscopic surgery. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 1995; 14(3):279-288.
[29]	. Trochimczuk R. Analysis of parallelogram mech-anism used to preserve remote center of motion for surgical telemanipulator. International Journal of Applied Mechanics & Engineering 2017; 22(1):229-240.
[30]	. Trochimczuk R. Comparative analysis of RCM mechanisms based on parallelogram used in surgical robots for laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2020; 58(4):911-925.
[31]	. Zong G, Pei X, Yu J, et al. Classification and type synthesis of 1-DOF remote center of motion mecha-nisms. Mechanism and Machine Theory 2008; 43(12):1585-1595.
[32]	. Li J, Zhang G, Xing Y, et al. A class of 2-degree-of-freedom planar remote center-of-motion mechanisms based on virtual parallelograms. Journal of Mechanisms & Robotics 2014; 6(3):359-359.
[33]	. Huang L, Yang Y, Su P, et al. Type synthesis of 1R1T remote center of motion mechanisms based on pantograph mechanisms. Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2015; 138(13):131-136.
[34]	. Sajid N, Takahiro E, Fumitoshi M. Design and optimization of a 2-degree-of-freedom planar remote center of motion mechanism for surgical manipulators with smaller footprint. Mechanism and Machine Theory 2018; 129:148-161.